Embracing Free Speech: Insights from I-House at UC Berkeley

By Shaun Carver, Executive Director and CEO

I am proud to share the results of our recent resident survey on free speech, which reveals a remarkable sentiment among our community. In a time when many college campuses across the U.S. are struggling with issues surrounding free expression, I-House stands out. An impressive 88% of our residents feel safe expressing their views within our multicultural environment.

A Positive Environment for Open Dialogue

Conducted in November 2024, our survey contradicts findings from organizations like the Knights Foundation and FIRE, which report low levels of comfort in expressing opinions on many campuses. At I-House, 94% of our students feel comfortable sharing controversial opinions with fellow residents, 83% are at ease discussing their views with other UC Berkeley students, and 82% are comfortable engaging with their professors.

These positive findings are a testament to the I-House model, which has bridged significant divides for nearly 100 years. We have shown that engaging in civil discourse while respecting differing viewpoints is possible. Fostering an environment where individuals feel safe to express their opinions is crucial for building understanding and connection.

A Safe Haven for Free Speech

The sentiments expressed by I-House residents distinctly set us apart from our peers at UC Berkeley, which has been ranked among the worst campuses for free speech. Only 42% of UC Berkeley students believe that university leaders prioritize free expression, whereas 91% of I-House residents trust our leadership to protect this fundamental right. Additionally, 62% of our residents feel that I-House does more to safeguard freedom of speech and expression than the broader campus.

Our residents have also clarified that they value respectful discourse over disruptive actions. Nearly 80% oppose shouting down speakers, 92% disagree with blocking peers from attending events, and 97% reject using violence as a protest method. This preference for civil dialogue reinforces our commitment to fostering an environment where open discussion is encouraged.

Encouraging Open Dialogue

Despite the often polarized climate we see today, I am encouraged to know that 64% of our residents are willing to speak up even when they feel uneasy. Many have reported discussing controversial topics more frequently since becoming part of our community. However, it’s also important to note that 60% have admitted to self-censoring in other campus settings, highlighting the unique support that I-House provides. As I observe our community, I am reminded that protecting free speech while respecting others is not only possible but essential. We’ve demonstrated this within our ecosystem, and nearly a century of experience backs its effectiveness.

I am optimistic about the future of free speech at I-House Berkeley. Our community’s commitment to open dialogue and mutual respect sets us apart from broader campus trends and reaffirms the importance of fostering an environment where every voice is heard.

In a world increasingly defined by polarization, I believe our approach—rooted in civil discourse and understanding—can serve as a model for other institutions. We can demonstrate that protecting free speech and respecting diverse perspectives can go hand in hand.

As we start to ring in a New Year, I am dedicated to ensuring that I-House remains a safe haven for dialogue, encouraging our residents to engage with each other thoughtfully and compassionately. Together, we will continue to build bridges across cultures and ideas, cultivating a community that values and thrives on free expression. Thank you for being part of this journey with us.